Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Sunday, June 29, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (5 comment(s))

Column: Consumers lack protection from abusive health insurers

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
“My father-in-law died of heart disease. He had no insurance,” the woman from Arcadia told me. “He tried for years to get insurance; he couldn’t get any company to cover him. Every insurance company he applied to turned him down.”

“My daughter has epilepsy, and she can’t get insurance,” another added.

I was comparing notes Saturday with local people on the mess that is our failing health insurance system. The stories are most unsettling.

“I had cancer years ago and no one will cover me today even though I have been healthy for almost two decades,” a Pepin County woman told me. “But I learned that if I lived in California the insurance company would be required to cover me.”

Most of us in Wisconsin like to think we have in place great consumer protections. We even have a department with consumer protection as part of its mandates -- the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection. But Wisconsin has failed when it comes to protecting consumers who buy individual health insurance.

Last week, Families USA, a national consumer advocacy group, released a study shedding light on the problems Wisconsin families face in getting basic consumer protection when buying individual health insurance coverage. The results show that Wisconsin is far behind other states in protecting health insurance consumers.

The study entitled “Failing Grades” shows Wisconsin and Illinois are the only two Midwest states that failed every measure of consumer protection related to pre-existing conditions. Illinois and Wisconsin joined 16 mostly southern states who failed to set rules on either defining or limiting restrictions on pre-existing conditions. Even Louisiana and Mississippi have a limit on how long an insurance company can hold past health history against a person when denying insurance coverage.

Wisconsin was rated as one of the worst states in dealing with pre-existing conditions. Not only can an insurance company deny coverage to a person suffering from illness, but there are no limits on how long someone can be denied coverage of the very problems for which they most need health insurance. In Wisconsin, there is absolutely no time limit on how long coverage can be excluded.

Even if you have insurance coverage, there is no consumer protection ensuring you will actually have claims paid if you do get sick. There is a hideous practice among insurance companies that allows them to deny legitimate claims when someone becomes sick.

The practice works like this: you develop a health problem and file claims seeking payment for bills related to the new health problem. You paid all your premiums and are up-to-date on all requirements of the policy. The insurance company receives your claims for the new health problem and begins digging back into your medical history -- looking back months or even years. The company then alleges you failed to disclose or should have known about some pre-existing condition for which you are now receiving care. The company denies the payment of your claim based on these allegations.

Wisconsin has some of the weakest consumer protection laws in the country regarding this practice of “look back.”

We need the political will to create the basic consumer protections residents of many other states enjoy. It is unacceptable for Wisconsin consumers to have worse protections than Louisiana and Mississippi. These problems are completely solvable. It is time we stand up for consumers and tackle these problems.

The complete study is available on the internet at (http://www.familiesusa.org/resources/publications/reports/failing-grades.html).

Democrat Kathleen Vinehout, Alma, represents the 31st state Senate District.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

re re Paul wrote on Jul 2, 2008 2:23 PM:

" Gee, I read what Paul submitted and I don't find what you did. "

re paul wrote on Jul 1, 2008 9:34 PM:

" SO you are saying its better for few people to have great coverage and the other people are on their own. Nice thought. "

Another Point wrote on Jul 1, 2008 7:16 AM:

" People that are injured on someones' property do not get medical bills paid by their insurance. You must sign a release to have treatment so that if a lawsuit occurs over this, the insurance companies side together and the public is not to know when they go to trial that out of any settlement they decide on goes to the attorney's and to the hospital. People are uninsurable for the rest of their life because of this. So, when a law suit does happen, the amount awarded to the person injured is usually less than the amount of the medical bills. Therefore, you are not only uninsurable in the future but also you are stuck with the remaining medical bills. Obviously it is the lawyer's who make out the best. They will use anything against a client to make them out to be bad.....it is partly their fault too, even if they are a child. "

Paul wrote on Jun 29, 2008 9:05 PM:

" This column represents a basic misunderstanding of insurance. You cannot buy car insurance after an accident. If you have a pre-existing medical condition, you are not buying insurance to cover and unanticipated cost, you are looking for someone else to cover your expenses.

Senator Vinehout wants the state government to run our health care. Her plan does not reduce costs or increase efficiencies. What she fails to tell you is that the same spending levels covering more people means only one thing - reduced access to health care.

Her plan offers no actuarial study to show that it will either increase quality of care or reduce the yearly increases in cost. She will achieve her goal of covering everyone by lowering the quality for everyone at the same time. It is simple math. "

Surprised wrote on Jun 27, 2008 4:33 PM:

" The state of Wisc. has one of the highest consentrations of insurance companies. Why do you think the rules are tilted to the insurance companies. $$$ given to our corrupt politicians from such companies. If we start getting fair treatment from the politicians the insurance companies will up and leave the state for different states. Blackmail is businesses friend. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Tomah Journal.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Tomah Journal. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.