Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer
spacer
 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Monday, August 27, 2007

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (9 comment(s))

Editorial: Myth of infallible private sector drives health care report

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Faced with the prospect of Wisconsin adopting universal health insurance, Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce has produced a document called “Wisconsin’s Healthier Choices for Affordable Health Care.”

The report says “the problem of increasing health care costs has no single cause,” but it blames the government for virtually everything that ails the health care system. It’s single-minded focus on government reveals a huge blind spot -- the worship of a supposedly infallible private sector.

In WMC theology, the private sector is never inefficient, bureaucratic or malevolent. Those who actually deal with private-sector health insurance plans know better. Americans must cope with a private-sector health care bureaucracy that gobbles up 31 cents of every health care dollar spent, and much of that bureaucracy is devoted to a shell game in which employers, health insurance carriers and hospitals do everything possible (ethical or not) to avoid the fixed costs of health care.

While most health insurance companies make good-faith efforts to pay legitimate claims, it’s not hard to find stories of people who paid thousands of dollars in health care premiums only to discover their insurance carrier had created a bogus excuse to deny payment.

WMC can make all the recommendations it wants about charging nursing students higher tuition and “ongoing development of private sector initiatives for collection and public reporting of quality, safety and cost information,” but the fundamental problems are these:

u Skyrocketing health care costs paired with skyrocketing income and wealth inequality. Private health insurance premiums could drop by 20 percent tomorrow and still remain beyond the reach of the working poor.

u Increased deregulation, including tort reform, which makes it extremely difficult to hold the private sector accountable when it willfully breaches health insurance contracts. The problem is exacerbated by campaign contributions that dictate policy choices and compromise regulatory agencies.

The ultimate question is whether everyone, regardless of economic circumstance, deserves the same level of quality health care and if WMC’s faith in “consumer-driven” health care guarantees that outcome. Perhaps those questions will be addressed in the next WMC report.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Re: Deb Matz wrote on Sep 10, 2007 7:47 PM:

" Some good points. But if 80% of people had comprehensive insurance coverage in the 1980s, and since then health care costs have increased and obesity has increased and we are spending much more than any other country on health care, why? Could this negative trend have anything to do with people losing coverage and with health insurance, meds, hospitals and clinics starting to advertise their services? The market has increased not cut health care costs. Ask any hospital billing department; they would love a single payer system with one set of forms. "

re Deb wrote on Sep 9, 2007 8:52 PM:

" Then if the solution is healthier living then lets shut down all the MCDonald, and wendys in the country. These kids and young parents did not just pick up these bad habits on their own. They had help from their parents. Look at the shelves in a store. We feed kids Mac and cheese and hot dogs all the time. They are bad for you. There is soda in every school and even so called good juice is loaded with sugar. Its easy to say well lose weight and take care of your kids better but this is a social problem with fast food and fat food. And anyone who states otherwise has their head firmly in the sand. My family can eat anything and stay what appears to be healthy but my in laws eat healthy and are all overweight. They all farm and work hard but are not in good health. YOu tell me what you should do. On spending on healthcare it is the focus on doing as many tests as possible on patients to find out that they have a virus. Its expensive because we allow it to be expensive. "

Proven Failure wrote on Sep 8, 2007 9:16 PM:

" Single payer healthcare is already a proven failure. Just ask all of those coming from single payer country's to the United States for their health care. This is in addition to the $18 billion plus price tag to be picked up by anyone who works and/or buys products or services in Wisconsin. We have enough welfare programs we don't need more. Nor do we need to create a welfare invatation to attrack more welfare cases into Wisconsin! "

Deb Matz wrote on Sep 4, 2007 8:02 PM:

" I am wondering why the State employee assumes that everyone would be better off with a plan like the State's? The fact is we were a healthier country per WHO (World Health Organization) in the 1960s when the average individual spent 12% of their income on health care vs. 5% today (per BLS). In the 1980s over 80% of the population had comprehensive coverage that was paid for by their employer. Since that time health care costs have increased at a rate greater than inflation, obesity rates have soared, and we have accomplished this by spending 50% more on care than any other country in the world. This is not something to be proud of. True reform should focus on creating a healthier society. Please note that insurance does not improve one’s health. Having insurers cover first dollar expenses has not controlled costs or made us a healthier country. The facts and trends just do not support this assumption. "

Personal Responsibility wrote on Sep 3, 2007 2:57 PM:

" The letter from DD is correct in where does it state in the Constitution the Gov't provides any health care? A bigger problem I see in this country is people not taking care of themselves or their kids. Look how fat a large percentage of our population is and how much we drink and eat. Only a fool expects a government agency to take care of them. Politics and politicians are only self serving. "

Old timer wrote on Aug 30, 2007 6:55 PM:

" A right on article. Not only does the private insurance bureaucracy gobble up six times what the public insurance bureaucracy does, having many providers requires hospitals and clinics to increase their billing staffs to handle all the different forms, coverages and procedures -- all to often before the sick person can get required services. A one provider system would save considerable money and provide more prompt service. Our health care system does too often suck, even with insurance. Most users of emergency rooms, in fact, are not the uninsured but the insured who resort to this method to get care in a more timely manner. "

Re DD wrote on Aug 29, 2007 5:54 PM:

" Now lets just complain about govt. and you have a better solution. I work for the state and If everyone had my insurance we would be a lot better off health wise. I have not seen a bill for my health care for 6 years. I do not abuse the system but I do make sure that my family remains healthy. If they have the flu or are sick I dont ignore it I set an appointment and get the proper treatment to rectify the illness. Now on the other hand. I take my kids in and all of a sudden they want to do x-rays and blood test to find out that its viral. This cost my insurance maybe 600.00 to 700.00 to find out nothing is wrong or nothing but rest can help. An aspirin in the hospital cost 5$ that cost them 5 cents. But its my fault because I have good insurance through the state and not the medical establishment that over medicates and tests to get their money out of us. "

DD wrote on Aug 29, 2007 10:40 AM:

" let's go back to years ago when you walked in to the Dr office and paid for your care. then you billed your insurance yourself. and waited for reimbursement. the constitution does not guarantee health care for anybody. and anybody who thinks it does better read it. the more bureacracy that is created, the higher costs will go. and as always, when any level of government gets involved, the costs go even higher. another point, no matter who pays for health care, it still sucks. I can name 5 hospitals right off the top of my head that I would not grace the doors of even if I was dying. get older, watch the bad care your friends and family get, and you'll want to blow your brains out before they haul you away in the ambulance. "

BB wrote on Aug 28, 2007 3:05 PM:

" The solution to the healthcare problem in this country is really quite simple. Everyone gets the same healtcare coverage of our elected officals in Congress. Wouldn't that be the fairest system for our country to establish? I think that this way, we would have a very affordable healthcare system in no time. What do you think? "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Tomah Journal.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Tomah Journal. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.