Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > News > Story

Published - Tuesday, July 17, 2007

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (13 comment(s))

State Senator Vinehout fighting for universal health care proposal

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Universal health care was at the center of Kathleen Vinehout’s upset victory over incumbent state Sen. Ron Brown (R-Eau Claire) last November.

Nine months later, Vinehout is pushing another uphill fight for universal health care in the state Capitol.

Vinehout visited Tomah Thursday to tout the Healthy Wisconsin plan that majority Democrats included in their version of the state budget.

The plan faces numerous obstacles -- Republicans who control the state Assembly are vehemently opposed, and Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle has yet to offer his opinion.

Vinehout said it’s up to citizens to let their elected representatives know how they feel.

“There are people with high-paid lobbyists who benefit from denying care to people,” Vinehout said during a press conference at Tomah Memorial Hospital. “The plan rests with the people of Wisconsin. The whole reason I was elected was to get the job done.”

The plan radically overhauls health care in Wisconsin by abolishing private insurance companies. Instead, an entity Health Wisconsin Trust would be funded by a combination of taxes on employees and businesses. Employees would pay four percent of their Social Security wages, and employers would be taxed on 10.5 percent of Social Security wages. Sole proprietors would pay 10 percent of their income up to a cap.

The trust would fund a health care plan that offers the same benefits members of the state Legislature and governor receive now. The plan isn’t tied to employment, and there are no distinctions between individual and family plans. Vinehout said people would be covered “because (they) exist.”

“We disconnect having a job from having health insurance,” Vinehout said. “(People) get health insurance because they are residents of the state.”

The only people exempt from Healthy Wisconsin are those who either work for the federal government or receive their health care from the federal government under Medicare, Medicaid or the Veterans Administration.

Vinehout said the plan would save state and local governments $1.36 billion a year in health care premiums, and the bill requires local governments to refund at least half the savings to taxpayers.

“Having health care off the table makes (collective) bargaining a lot easier,” she said.

She also believes small business will warm to the plan.

“I think about the business people I met during the campaign who wanted to buy health insurance for their employees but couldn’t afford it,” she said. “This puts large and small employers on an even playing field.”

Although groups representing hospitals haven’t endorsed Healthy Wisconsin, Vinehout said hospital employees are very interested in the plan and appreciate that the plan has sparked a significant health care debate.

Healthy Wisconsin

Funding

Employees pay 4 percent of social security wages

Employers pay 10.5 perent of social security wages

Self-employed pay 10 percent up to a cap

Benefits

Everyone covered except those on Medicare, Medicaid, VA patients and federal employees.

Insured can get care at provider of his or her choice

$300 deductible for individual; $600 for families, no deductible for children

Co-pays of $20 per office visit; $5-$40 for prescritption drug

Preventive care paid at 100 percent

$60 penalty for inappropriate use of emergency room

Management

Wisconsin Health Care will administer the plan. The trust offers participants choice of plans and can’t exclude anyone for a pre-existing condition
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

can't afford healthcare wrote on Jul 23, 2007 2:04 PM:

" what is the difference if I make $1000 per month premium health insurance for family and go broke trying to make premiums. Not to mention the high deductibles to the tune of $3000 per year with very little actual coverage. OR if I wait and have to pay for a million dollar bill to the tune of $1000 per month? Hey, maybe I'll get lucky and not have a million dollar bill to pay and live a little in the process. Insurance is to the point of rediculas. I say screw it, lets go back to the old ways of home remedies until medical is serious enough to warrant a doctor. Schools and daycares are adding to our delima with sending these kids home with a sniffle when it is a cold or cutting in a tooth. When a Doctor visit costs $120 for the honor of seeing an actual doctor (or maybe on a PA) for less than 10 minutes, no wonder our healthcare is so substandard. And, if you don't diagnose yourself before you see them, don't count on accurate treatment in that 10 minute evaluation! "

Krusty wrote on Jul 22, 2007 10:49 PM:

" Greg, Did you know that Sen. Vinehout's husband was making $125 an hour working for the state of Illinois when they chose to dump their insurance? This is a hoax. http://www.bootsandsabers.com/index.php/weblog/permalink/typical_farmers_or_manure_spreaders/#When:00:21:00Z "

Beverly wrote on Jul 21, 2007 3:27 PM:

" I'm self-employed and uninsured, which is scary because small health incidents can cost hundreds or thousands of dollars. However,the Healthy Wisonsin plan's 10% tax on sole proprieters would be crippling to us unless the cap was pretty low. We already pay 15% extra in self-employment taxes, which is a hard pill to swallow every year. "

joe wrote on Jul 20, 2007 6:17 PM:

" why should i have to pay more in taxes just so we can have sub-pare heath care ( the care will be o:k at first,then as in canada and england and france the coast keeps going up and care declines) "

re adam wrote on Jul 19, 2007 2:45 PM:

" So what if its 80\20. The people who control the govt. and businesses in this country are 90\10 people also. 10% of the population control 90% of the wealth but thats ok. They dictate who gets good care who doesn't. Etc. HEy stupid. If you have a heart attack today how is your insurance. Will you go bankrupt paying whats left over after your good insurance declines most of it?? "

Stupid wrote on Jul 19, 2007 1:56 PM:

" Oh yeah, the government running health care. What a great plan?!@# I don't make a whole lot of money but am still able to find health insurance. People that don't have it do not really want it. "

JDO wrote on Jul 19, 2007 6:52 AM:

" I guess you havent looked lately but most of our services that we have mirror socialism. Fire and police departments, schools, farms payments, roads, and on and on. But oh my lets not socialize something that will actually help the WORKING poor. There is a lot of people working for companies that dont like to ruin their bottom line with benefits. "

Adam wrote on Jul 19, 2007 12:22 AM:

" I am a medical professional who once worked in Wisconsin (and am a UW grad). You have among the best doctors and hospitals in the country. The vast majority of people in Wisconsin have access to excellent care and do not have to wait (or wait long) to see a top doctor. With this plan, which is socialized medicine of the type advocated by Michael Moore, you can forget about your great health care system. Why? First of all, the top doctors will surely find the government-set reimbursements inadequate (as many already do with Medicare and Medicaid). They will either refuse to participate and set up "concierage" practices outside the state bureaucracy, or they will more likely leave the state. Fresh UW and MCOW graduates will no doubt be lured away upon completion of residency. Say good-bye to a substantial number of your doctors. Those who remain will be wildly overburdened. Wait times will stretch to months. Procedures will be postponed for those without extra cash (those with money will simply go to Minnesota, Illinois or Ohio). The second problem with this Canadian-style system is what's known as the 80/20 rule. This is the fact that 20% of people consume 80% of health care costs (the rule is actually closer to 90/10). These are people with diabetes, heart failure, and other chronic diseases such as COPD. It dosen't matter who's paying, these people are going to keep on consuming. Unless attempts are made to modify behavior, costs will never decrease. "

Rob wrote on Jul 18, 2007 5:57 PM:

" Finally, a new idea for the hideous health care situation we suffer through in Wisconsin. Let's get health care to everyone. "

Phil Hoyer wrote on Jul 18, 2007 2:09 PM:

" Vinehouts has made a big mistake she used $9000 of there money to fund her campaign for office instead of buying health insurance now she wants the rest of us to pay her way. If she cannot handle her own household how can we trust her to run a multibillion dolar household "

no socialism please wrote on Jul 18, 2007 9:23 AM:

" This is socialized medicine. I'm not a fan of socialism, communism, or other attempts to create a welfare state. Senator Vinehout is happy to have her hand in the pocket of those who actually work and pay their bills. Not my idea of a good plan "

Kudos wrote on Jul 17, 2007 7:19 PM:

" Good job Kathleen. Finally a politician who kept their word and is trying to do something about the problems we face. "

Greg wrote on Jul 16, 2007 1:25 PM:

" THANK GOD SHE WAS ELECTED.THIS IS SOMEONE WHO WILL, AT LEAST, FLOAT IDEAS TO FIX THE PROBLEMS THAT SO MANY OF US FACE IN THIS AREA. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Tomah Journal.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Tomah Journal. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.