SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



TOP WHEELS

WHEELS
FOR YOU




 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Wednesday, May 12, 2004

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (1 comment(s))

Editorial: Radicals in Congress seek repeal of elected Senate

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Wisconsin voters are lucky to have a contested U.S. Senate race this year. Three credible Republican challengers - state Senator Robert Welch and businessmen Tim Michels and Russ Darrow - are waging vigorous campaigns and staging debates. Any of them would run a strong race against incumbent Democrat Russ Feingold this fall and give voters a real choice in November.

However, if some notable members of Congress have their way, this kind of campaign wouldn't happen at all. They've actually called for repeal of the 17th Amendment, which allows voters to choose their U.S. Senators.

Before the amendment was ratified in 1913, Senators were picked by state legislatures. Now, two prominent lawmakers - Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia, the only Democrat in either house of Congress who openly supports the re-election of President Bush, and Rep. Tom DeLay of Texas, the number-two Republican in the House of Representatives -- want to turn the clock back 90 years and cut voters from the process. Said DeLay: "I am willing to have a debate that electing Senators by the popular vote has had a very real negative impact on this country."

Fine, let's debate. Since the 17th Amendment was passed, Congress has established Medicare and Social Security, legislated the 40-hour work week and minimum wage, created the GI Bill, passed several landmark Civil Rights laws and established the regulatory structures that ensure stable banking and securities transactions. Politicians who long for the good old days need to explain why America was a better country before women could vote or racial segregation was repealed.

Another argument for keeping the 17th Amendment: Senate elections are more competitive than House races. The Founding Fathers had intended for the Senate to act as a check on a popularly elected House, but reapportionment has turned that notion on its head. Senate races are far more competitive because state lines, unlike Congressional boundaries, can't be reapportioned. Only 30 to 50 House races out of 435 are genuinely competitive in any given year, and Ron Kind is the only Wisconsin incumbent who faces more than a token challenger. If Senators aren't elected, it's possible that voters in some jurisdictions will go decades without participating in a meaningful Congressional race. It's particularly ironic that DeLay wants to abolish the 17th Amendment, given his involvement in the egregious gerrymander in Texas.

Most voters probably believe that electing Senators through the popular vote is a good thing, but the fact that two notable politicians want to repeal the 17th Amendment is more evidence of how radicalized Congress has become. Let there be no mistake - the achievements of the Progressive Era and New Deal are under attack from 21st century people with 19th century values, and it will frame the choices that voters face this fall. Thanks to Zell Miller and Tom DeLay, those choices are absolutely clear.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Aldous Ruminor wrote on Jul 18, 2007 1:21 AM:

" Now, with the benefit of more than 3 years since this article was written, perhaps the author of this is having misgivings. All of the examples given in the article are big government solutions, that have empowered groups of people by government sanction, in many instances to the detriment of groups not so prioritized. As far as the snide reference to 19th century values, what was wrong with many of those values? The Federal Reserve, and the Income Tax, were creatures of the Progressive Era. And what, pray tell, was the value in introducing those? The Federal Reserve has given the United States, and the world, for that matter, a fiat currency, and an infinite progressive devaluation of the currency. This may be fine for those that are Government workers, which I suspect this author might be, or those who can demand that their incomes be increased. For those that can't this is a severe penalty, as any saving they have managed to accumulate suffer deterioration over time. Tomah hasn't seen the level of illegal immigration that the southern part of the country has. Thanks to the actions, and behavior of the U. S. Senate currently, that could very well change, as Tomah begins to see a Taco stand on every corner serviced by illegal aliens. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Tomah Journal.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Tomah Journal, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The Tomah Journal requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2009 The Tomah Journal. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.